Go Back   Sound Unsound Forums > Community Center > Scene Chat
Connect with Facebook

Welcome to the Sound Unsound ForumsRegister

Discuss Open Source GigaStudio Petition: Why It’s Unlikely in the Scene Chat forum at Sound Unsound Forums; Amidst the news of [Only registered and activated users can remove adverts and see links. ...

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 24-07-2008, 08:03 PM   #1
Default Open Source GigaStudio Petition: Why It’s Unlikely

Amidst the news of [Only registered and activated users can remove adverts and see links. ] , we’ve heard some isolated calls to open source Giga itself. There’s even an [Only registered and activated users can remove adverts and see links. ] petition ([Only registered and activated users can remove adverts and see links. ] ). The likelihood of open sourcing a code base as large as Giga’s, though, seems extremely slim. Making an open source project from a commercial developer successful requires a number of critical ingredients. You need the will of the company that owns the code, of course, but also:
  • a code base that is accessible to people who have never seen it before
  • code that’s free from "encumbrances" or code or concepts proprietary to a third party, such as licensed libraries or materials covered by patents (and thus usually requiring removal)
  • an active community of developers
  • a process for maintaining development
Or, put more simply: you have to fully own the thing, you have to want to share the thing, and there has to be a group of people who can work on it productively. Even satisfying one of these is unlikely here, let alone all of them.
Ownership, in particular, is an area a lot of people underestimate. Let’s assume for the sake of argument that Tascam/Teac wanted to open source the code — and they almost certainly don’t. Even if they did, they might be unable to do so, because they may not own all of its contents. Then there’s the question of whether Giga would really be an ideal framework for open development. Keep in mind that, while Mozilla’s Firefox grew out of proprietary Netscape code, it was also an independent platform, and setting up that platform — one that would be better suited to open development — took years of work.
There are some really terrific open source sound projects out there. CSound, for instance, once proprietary (though free for non-commercial use) is today covered under the open LGPL license. As a result, it’s made an appearance in karaoke hardware. Pure Data (Pd) was recently incorporated into interactive music design for the upcoming EA game Spore from Will Wright, as composed by Brian Eno. Neither of these products is as end-user friendly as a typical commercial product, it’s true. But each has been incorporated into other projects in a way that would be impossible with a proprietary application. I love Max, for instance, but licensing Max for Spore wouldn’t have made any sense; Pd happens to run easily in a "headless" operation, and it’s open source.
Open source code (or free software, if you like), is just one part of what this software industry needs. We could really use better interchange file formats, more extensible applications, and more standards for communication between software and software, software and hardware, and hardware and hardware. Even if you use exclusively free or exclusively proprietary software, these are important.
In fact, if we weren’t stuck with a mess of formats for files and communication, the death of one application might not be so damaging. And given that artists are wildly loyal to specific tools for artistic reasons, it seems, even pragmatically, that format lock-in is overkill. All our real-world evidence says people stick with software because they love the tool and have a good relationship with the company that makes it.
When it comes to open source code, though, you need a community of people investing time, often without direct profit. I think there’s more excitement now about doing that than at any time in recent memory in music technology. OpenGiga may never see the light of day, but you can expect progress on free projects like Pd will accelerate.
See also yesterday’s story and accompanying discussion:
[Only registered and activated users can remove adverts and see links. ]

The discussion there was about an independent project that would make sense for open development, not an open Giga or Giga clone.

[Only registered and activated users can remove adverts and see links. ]
Sound Unsound's Web Crawler
 
Sound Unsound Bot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 805
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Sound Unsound Bot is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Life After Giga: A Call for Open Source Sampling Development Sound Unsound Bot Scene Chat 0 24-07-2008 08:03 PM
GigaStudio is Dead, Leaving Sampler Users High and Dry Sound Unsound Bot Scene Chat 0 23-07-2008 06:00 PM
Aurora: Gorgeous, Open Source DJ-Style USB Controller; Details from the Creators Sound Unsound Bot Scene Chat 0 10-07-2008 03:10 AM
Open Letter chromium05 Bootlegs (Mashups) 1 25-04-2008 04:45 AM



Ad Management plugin by RedTyger